Re: slow fio random read benchmark, need help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>Same results with rbd kernel driver without QEMU involved. 

I confirm , I have same result wirh rbd kernel driver,so it not a qemu problem.


----- Mail original ----- 

De: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
À: "Gregory Farnum" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
Cc: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Josh Durgin" <josh.durgin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier@xxxxxxxxx>, "Marcus Sorensen" <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>, "Sage Weil" <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Envoyé: Jeudi 1 Novembre 2012 11:54:03 
Objet: Re: slow fio random read benchmark, need help 

Am 01.11.2012 11:40, schrieb Gregory Farnum: 
> I'm not sure that latency addition is quite correct. Most use cases 
> cases do multiple IOs at the same time, and good benchmarks tend to 
> reflect that. 
> 
> I suspect the IO limitations here are a result of QEMU's storage 
> handling (or possibly our client layer) more than anything else — Josh 
> can talk about that more than I can, though! 
> -Greg 

Same results with rbd kernel driver without QEMU involved. 

Stefan 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux