RE: slow fio random read benchmark, need help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> For the record, I'm not saying that it's the entire reason why the performance
> is lower (obviously since iscsi is better), I'm just saying that when you're
> talking about high iops, adding 100us (best case gigabit) to each request and
> response is significant

iSCSI also uses the network (also adds 100us to esach request), so that simply can't be the reason.

I always thought a distributed block storage could do such things 
faster (or at least as fast) than a single centralized store?

- Dietmar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux