Re: Ceph performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Roman,

Is this with the ceph fuse client or the ceph kernel module?

Its not surprising that the local file system (/home) is so much faster than a mounted ceph volume, especially the first time the directory tree is traversed (metadata results are cached at the client to improve performance). Try running the same find command on the ceph volume and see if the cached results at the client improve performance at all.

In order to understand what the performance of ceph should be capable of doing with your deployment for this specific workload, you should run iperf between two nodes to get an idea of your latency limits.

Also, I noticed that the real timings you listed for ceph and /home are offset by exactly 17 minutes (user and sys are identical). Was that a copy/paste error, by chance?

-sam

On 10/29/2012 09:01 AM, Roman Alekseev wrote:
Hi,

Kindly guide me how to improve performance on the cluster which consist
of 5 dedicated servers:

- ceph.conf: http://pastebin.com/hT3qEhUF
- file system on all drives is ext4
- mount options "user_xattr"
- each server has :
CPU:Intel® Xeon® Processor E5335(8M Cache, 2.00 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB) x2
MEM: 4Gb DDR2
- 1Gb network

Simple test:

mounted as ceph
root@client1:/mnt/mycephfs# time find . | wc -l
83932

real    17m55.399s
user    0m0.152s
sys    0m1.528s

on 1 HDD:

root@client1:/home# time find . | wc -l
83932

real    0m55.399s
user    0m0.152s
sys    0m1.528s

Please help me to find out the issue. Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux