On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Noah Watkins wrote: > I was just take a look at this for libcephfs. Does it make sense to > have ceph_release free CephContext, and ceph_unmount with everything > else: client, messenger, and mon client? Yeah... _create and _release should create/release the ceph_mount_info and associated cct, and mount/unmount will set up and tear down the Client and friends. sage > > - Noah > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Noah Watkins <jayhawk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On the Java, side being able to do an unmount to free resources, while > > still keeping the context, makes things more natural to both explain, > > and code. I'm sure this would be true for other language bindings as > > well. > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I'm annoyed that ceph_shutdown() both unmounts and releases the resource, > >> but there is a separate _create() and _mount() method. I wonder if it > >> makes sense to introduce ceph_umount() and ceph_release() and make > >> ceph_shutdown() call them (for compatibility). > >> > >> I thought librados was a bit cleaner, but it appears to be doing the same > >> thing.. meh. (Also, the docs for _shutdown() incorrectly state that > >> shutdown isn't needed if rados_connect() fails.. but presumably the > >> resource still needs to be freed?) > >> > >> Is this worth fixing? > >> > >> sage > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
