> This all looks right to me. I only have one concern: if, at some future > point, we decide it's necessary or worthwhile to avoid non-backfill > recovery due to targets begin full, does this approach preclude an elegant > solution? I believe this encourages an elegant solution: We add a new state if a remote reservation is rejected: WaitRemoteRecoveryReserved -> SleepALittle -> LocalReserving In the new state we drop the remote reservations we acquired and wait until a timer goes off before transitioning back into LocalReserving. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
