Re: Slow ceph fs performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> However, my suspicion is that you're limited by metadata throughput
> here. How large are your files? There might be some MDS or client
> tunables we can adjust, but rsync's workload is a known weak spot for
> CephFS.

I feel like people are missing this part of Greg's message. Everyone
is so busy benchmarking RADOS small I/O, but what if it's currently
bottlenecked by all the file-level access operations that interact
with the MDS? Rsync causes a ton of those.

If you want to benchmark just the small IO, you can't compare rsync to rsync.

If you want to benchmark just the metadata part, rsync with 0-size
files might actually be an interesting workload.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux