On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, S?awomir Skowron wrote: >> Unfortunately here is the problem in my Ubuntu 12.04.1 >> >> --9399-- You may be able to write your own handler. >> --9399-- Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL. >> --9399-- Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report >> --9399-- it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html. >> ==9399== Warning: noted but unhandled ioctl 0x9408 with no size/direction hints >> ==9399== This could cause spurious value errors to appear. >> ==9399== See README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL for guidance on >> writing a proper wrapper. >> --9399-- WARNING: unhandled syscall: 306 >> --9399-- You may be able to write your own handler. >> --9399-- Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL. >> --9399-- Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report >> --9399-- it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html. >> ==9399== Warning: noted but unhandled ioctl 0x9408 with no size/direction hints >> ==9399== This could cause spurious value errors to appear. >> ==9399== See README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL for guidance on >> writing a proper wrapper. > > These are harmless; it just doesn't recognize syncfs(2) or one of the > ioctls, but everything else works. > >> ^C2012-09-05 09:13:18.660048 a964700 -1 mon.0@0(leader) e4 *** Got >> Signal Interrupt *** >> ==9399== > > Did you hit control-c? > > If you leave it running it should gather the memory utilization info we > need... Yes it's running now, and i will see tomorrow how much memory mon consumes. > > sage > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, S?awomir Skowron wrote: >> >> Valgrind returns nothing. >> >> >> >> valgrind --tool=massif --log-file=ceph_mon_valgrind ceph-mon -i 0 > log.txt >> > >> > The fork is probably confusing it. I usually pass -f to ceph-mon (or >> > ceph-osd etc) to keep it in the foreground. Can you give that a go? >> > e.g., >> > >> > valgrind --tool-massif ceph-mon -i 0 -f & >> > >> > and watch for the massif.out.$pid file. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > sage >> > >> > >> >> >> >> ==30491== Massif, a heap profiler >> >> ==30491== Copyright (C) 2003-2011, and GNU GPL'd, by Nicholas Nethercote >> >> ==30491== Using Valgrind-3.7.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info >> >> ==30491== Command: ceph-mon -i 0 >> >> ==30491== Parent PID: 4013 >> >> ==30491== >> >> ==30491== >> >> >> >> cat massif.out.26201 >> >> desc: (none) >> >> cmd: ceph-mon -i 0 >> >> time_unit: i >> >> #----------- >> >> snapshot=0 >> >> #----------- >> >> time=0 >> >> mem_heap_B=0 >> >> mem_heap_extra_B=0 >> >> mem_stacks_B=0 >> >> heap_tree=empty >> >> >> >> What i have done wrong ?? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:34 PM, S?awomir Skowron <szibis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > I have this problem too. My mon's in 0.48.1 cluster have 10GB RAM >> >> > each, with 78 osd, and 2k request per minute (max) in radosgw. >> >> > >> >> > Now i have run one via valgrind. I will send output when mon grow up. >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Xiaopong Tran wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Is there any known memory issue with mon? We have 3 mons running, and >> >> >>> on keeps on crashing after 2 or 3 days, and I think it's because mon >> >> >>> sucks up all memory. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Here's mon after starting for 10 minutes: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND >> >> >>> 13700 root 20 0 163m 32m 3712 S 4.3 0.1 0:05.15 ceph-mon >> >> >>> 2595 root 20 0 1672m 523m 0 S 1.7 1.6 954:33.56 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 1941 root 20 0 1292m 220m 0 S 0.7 0.7 946:40.69 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2316 root 20 0 1169m 198m 0 S 0.7 0.6 420:26.74 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2395 root 20 0 1149m 184m 0 S 0.7 0.6 364:29.08 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2487 root 20 0 1354m 373m 0 S 0.7 1.2 401:13.97 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 235 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:37.68 kworker/4:1 >> >> >>> 1304 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:00.16 jbd2/sda3-8 >> >> >>> 1327 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 13:07.00 xfsaild/sdf1 >> >> >>> 2011 root 20 0 1240m 177m 0 S 0.3 0.6 411:52.91 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2153 root 20 0 1095m 166m 0 S 0.3 0.5 370:56.01 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2725 root 20 0 1214m 186m 0 S 0.3 0.6 378:16.59 ceph-osd >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Here's the memory situation of mon on another machine, after mon has >> >> >>> been running for 3 hours: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND >> >> >>> 1716 root 20 0 1923m 1.6g 4028 S 7.6 5.2 8:45.82 ceph-mon >> >> >>> 1923 root 20 0 774m 138m 5052 S 0.7 0.4 1:28.56 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2114 root 20 0 836m 143m 4864 S 0.7 0.4 1:20.14 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2304 root 20 0 863m 176m 4988 S 0.7 0.5 1:13.30 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2578 root 20 0 823m 150m 5056 S 0.7 0.5 1:24.55 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2781 root 20 0 819m 131m 4900 S 0.7 0.4 1:12.14 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2995 root 20 0 863m 179m 5024 S 0.7 0.6 1:41.96 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 3474 root 20 0 888m 208m 5608 S 0.7 0.6 7:08.08 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 1228 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:07.01 jbd2/sda3-8 >> >> >>> 1853 root 20 0 859m 176m 4820 S 0.3 0.5 1:17.01 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 3373 root 20 0 789m 118m 4916 S 0.3 0.4 1:06.26 ceph-osd >> >> >>> >> >> >>> And here is the situation on a third node, mon has been running >> >> >>> for over a week: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND >> >> >>> 1717 root 20 0 68.8g 26g 2044 S 91.5 84.1 9220:40 ceph-mon >> >> >>> 1986 root 20 0 1281m 226m 0 S 1.7 0.7 1225:28 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2196 root 20 0 1501m 538m 0 S 1.0 1.7 1221:54 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2266 root 20 0 1121m 176m 0 S 0.7 0.5 399:23.70 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2056 root 20 0 1072m 167m 0 S 0.3 0.5 403:49.76 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2126 root 20 0 1412m 458m 0 S 0.3 1.4 1215:48 ceph-osd >> >> >>> 2337 root 20 0 1128m 188m 0 S 0.3 0.6 408:31.88 ceph-osd >> >> >>> >> >> >>> So, after a while, sooner or later, mon is going to crash, just >> >> >>> a matter of time. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Does anyone see anything like this? This is kinda scary. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> OS: Debian Wheezy 3.2.0-3-amd64 >> >> >>> Ceph: 0.48argonaut (commit:c2b20ca74249892c8e5e40c12aa14446a2bf2030) >> >> >> >> >> >> Can you try with 0.48.1argonaut? >> >> >> >> >> >> If it still happens, can you run ceph-mon through massif? >> >> >> >> >> >> valgrind --tool=massif ceph-mon -i whatever >> >> >> >> >> >> That'll generate a massif.out file (make sure it's there; you may need to >> >> >> specify the output file for valgrind) over time. Once ceph-mon starts >> >> >> eating ram, send us a copy of the file and we can hopefully see what is >> >> >> leaking. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> sage >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> With this issue on hand, I'll have to monitor it closely and >> >> >>> restart mon once in a while, or I will get a crash (which is >> >> >>> still good enough), or a system that does not respond at >> >> >>> all because memory is exhausted, and the whole ceph cluster >> >> >>> is unreachable. We had this problem in the morning, mon on one >> >> >>> node exhausted the memory, none of the ceph command responds >> >> >>> anymore, the only thing left to do is to hard reset the node. >> >> >>> The whole cluster was basically done at that time. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Here is our usage situation: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> 1) A few applications which read and write data through >> >> >>> librados API, we have about 20-30 connections at any one time. >> >> >>> So far, our apps have no such memory issue, we have been >> >> >>> monitoring them closely. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> 2) We have a few scripts which pull data from an old storage >> >> >>> system, and use the rados command to put it into ceph. >> >> >>> Basically, just shell script. Each rados command is run >> >> >>> to write one object (one file), and exit. We run about >> >> >>> 25 scripts simultaneously, which means at any one time, >> >> >>> there are at most 25 connections. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I don't think this is a very busy system. But this >> >> >>> memory issue is definitely a problem for us. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Thanks for helping. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Xiaopong >> >> >>> -- >> >> >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> >> >>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> >> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > ----- >> >> > Pozdrawiam >> >> > >> >> > S?awek "sZiBis" Skowron >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ----- >> >> Pozdrawiam >> >> >> >> S?awek "sZiBis" Skowron >> >> -- >> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> ----- >> Pozdrawiam >> >> S?awek "sZiBis" Skowron >> >> -- ----- Pozdrawiam Sławek "sZiBis" Skowron -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
