Re: CephFS mount delay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No, Sage's one-liner should definitely handle it. We were just waiting
for the monclient to tick before requesting updated subs.

My question is how that changed — have mounts always taken ~3 seconds
to go through and we just didn't notice, or did we change how the
monclient handles subscription requests and didn't consider the
implications?
-Greg

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Mike Ryan <mike.ryan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This smells like it might be a DNS misconfiguration. Make sure you've
> got entries in your hosts files for whatever machines are involved.
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:39:36PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
>> What about this:
>>
>> diff --git a/src/client/Client.cc b/src/client/Client.cc
>> index 3333966..003e3f8 100644
>> --- a/src/client/Client.cc
>> +++ b/src/client/Client.cc
>> @@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ int Client::init()
>>    monclient->set_want_keys(CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_MDS | CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_OSD);
>>    monclient->sub_want("mdsmap", 0, 0);
>>    monclient->sub_want("osdmap", 0, CEPH_SUBSCRIBE_ONETIME);
>> +  monclient->renew_subs();
>>
>>    // logger
>>    PerfCountersBuilder plb(cct, "client", l_c_first, l_c_last);
>>
>>
>> If that doesn't do it, can you reproduce with 'debug client = 20' and
>> 'debug monc = 20'?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> sage
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Noah Watkins wrote:
>>
>> > Here ya go:
>> >
>> > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7899675/client.log
>> > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7899675/mds.a.log
>> > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7899675/mds.b.log
>> > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7899675/mds.c.log
>> >
>> > - Noah
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > I see that Server::handle_client_session is calling mdlog->flush(), so
>> > > it's a bit odd.  Can you generate a log with 'debug ms = 1' on the client
>> > > (and maybe mds) side?
>> > >
>> > > s
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Noah Watkins wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Noah Watkins <jayhawk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >> >> Using a tick interval of 1 drops the cost down to 3 seconds, but still
>> > >> >> a long time for running many unit tests that use fresh mounts.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Are you using ceph-fuse or the kernel client? And how many of each daemon type?
>> > >>
>> > >> I'm using the C api, and there are 3 mon, 3 mds, 1 osd.
>> > >>
>> > >> > That said; I'm seeing broadly similar numbers ? with one of each
>> > >> > daemon (but otherwise the vstart defaults) "time sudo ceph-fuse mnt"
>> > >> > reports 3.1 seconds.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux