On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Sylvain Munaut <s.munaut@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > In the OSD log I see thos " auth: could not find secret_id=0" ... Any idea > ? > > Because obviously it succeeds a couple of millisecond later. > > > 2012-08-29 13:47:17.873583 7f981ae9d700 0 -- 192.168.1.71:6807/2080 > >> 192.168.1.28:0/440990652 pipe(0x75d6800 sd=33 pgs=0 cs=0 > l=0).accept peer addr is really 192.168.1.28:0/440990652 (socket is > 192.168.1.28:38689/0) > 2012-08-29 13:47:17.873717 7f981ae9d700 0 auth: could not find > secret_id=0 > 2012-08-29 13:47:17.873727 7f981ae9d700 0 cephx: verify_authorizer > could not get service secret for service osd secret_id=0 > 2012-08-29 13:47:17.873731 7f981ae9d700 1 > CephxAuthorizeHandler::verify_authorizer isvalid=0 > 2012-08-29 13:47:17.873733 7f981ae9d700 0 -- 192.168.1.71:6807/2080 > >> 192.168.1.28:0/440990652 pipe(0x75d6800 sd=33 pgs=0 cs=0 > l=1).accept bad authorizer > 2012-08-29 13:47:17.873925 7f981ae9d700 0 auth: could not find > secret_id=0 > 2012-08-29 13:47:17.873938 7f981ae9d700 0 cephx: verify_authorizer > could not get service secret for service osd secret_id=0 > 2012-08-29 13:47:17.873941 7f981ae9d700 1 > CephxAuthorizeHandler::verify_authorizer isvalid=0 > 2012-08-29 13:47:17.873942 7f981ae9d700 0 -- 192.168.1.71:6807/2080 > >> 192.168.1.28:0/440990652 pipe(0x75d6800 sd=33 pgs=0 cs=0 > l=1).accept bad authorizer > 2012-08-29 13:47:18.599819 7f981ae9d700 0 -- 192.168.1.71:6807/2080 > >> 192.168.1.28:0/440990652 pipe(0x56e6600 sd=33 pgs=0 cs=0 > l=0).accept peer addr is really 192.168.1.28:0/440990652 (socket is > 192.168.1.28:38690/0) > 2012-08-29 13:47:18.600056 7f981ae9d700 1 > CephxAuthorizeHandler::verify_authorizer isvalid=1 > 2012-08-29 13:47:18.600433 7f981e2ae700 0 osd.3 913 pg[2.14( v > 905'2959 (79'1958,905'2959] n=17 ec=1 les/c 913/913 912/912/904) [3,0] > r=0 lpr=912 mlcod 0'0 active+clean] watch: ctx->obc=0x5bccb00 cookie=6 > oi.version=2956 ctx->at_version=913'2960 > 2012-08-29 13:47:18.600443 7f981e2ae700 0 osd.3 913 pg[2.14( v > 905'2959 (79'1958,905'2959] n=17 ec=1 les/c 913/913 912/912/904) [3,0] > r=0 lpr=912 mlcod 0'0 active+clean] watch: oi.user_version=2955 > > Did that happen just once, or is it a reoccurring incident? What it basically says that the client sent a request using an old ticket. Did the client just wake up? Yehuda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
