Hi Gregory, Thanks for all those updates :) On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Sébastien Han <han.sebastien@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> The major statement about CephFS remains the same for a couple of >> months: it's not ready for production yet. The wiki page >> http://ceph.com/docs/master/faq/#is-ceph-production-quality hasn't >> changed for ages. >> >> Is it still true? > Yes; CephFS is not ready for production yet. We haven't done much work > on it in the last 6-8 months, as we've been focusing on RADOS itself. > >> If so, could please elaborate on these points? :) > There are a couple of known bugs in the filesystem that haven't been > tracked down yet, and the QA that we do on it is still very limited. > We run a lot of tests on it with working systems, but we (Inktank) > haven't done aged filesystem tests, or done good testing under failure > scenarios, etc. And multi-mds systems are entirely unreliable. > Now, I believe there are people running long-term systems that have > done so successfully — it depends on what features you make use of, > etc. > >> How far are we from a stable release? > We really don't know enough about what work still remains to be able > to answer that question. :/ > -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
