On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxxxx)> wrote: >> > On Monday, July 16, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxxxx)> wrote: >> > > > "ceph pg set_full_ratio 0.95" >> > > > "ceph pg set_nearfull_ratio 0.94" >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Monday, July 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxxxx)> wrote: >> > > > > > On Saturday, July 14, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:sage@xxxxxxxxxxx)> wrote: >> > > > > > > > On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xxxxxxx (mailto:andrey@xxxxxxx)> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Recently I`ve reduced my test suite from 6 to 4 osds at ~60% usage on >> > > > > > > > > > six-node, >> > > > > > > > > > and I have removed a bunch of rbd objects during recovery to avoid >> > > > > > > > > > overfill. >> > > > > > > > > > Right now I`m constantly receiving a warn about nearfull state on >> > > > > > > > > > non-existing osd: >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > health HEALTH_WARN 1 near full osd(s) >> > > > > > > > > > monmap e3: 3 mons at >> > > > > > > > > > {0=192.168.10.129:6789/0,1=192.168.10.128:6789/0,2=192.168.10.127:6789/0}, >> > > > > > > > > > election epoch 240, quorum 0,1,2 0,1,2 >> > > > > > > > > > osdmap e2098: 4 osds: 4 up, 4 in >> > > > > > > > > > pgmap v518696: 464 pgs: 464 active+clean; 61070 MB data, 181 GB >> > > > > > > > > > used, 143 GB / 324 GB avail >> > > > > > > > > > mdsmap e181: 1/1/1 up {0=a=up:active} >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > HEALTH_WARN 1 near full osd(s) >> > > > > > > > > > osd.4 is near full at 89% >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Needless to say, osd.4 remains only in ceph.conf, but not at crushmap. >> > > > > > > > > > Reducing has been done 'on-line', e.g. without restart entire cluster. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Whoops! It looks like Sage has written some patches to fix this, but >> > > > > > > > > for now you should be good if you just update your ratios to a larger >> > > > > > > > > number, and then bring them back down again. :) >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Restarting ceph-mon should also do the trick. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks for the bug report! >> > > > > > > > sage >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Should I restart mons simultaneously? >> > > > > > I don't think restarting will actually do the trick for you — you actually will need to set the ratios again. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Restarting one by one has no >> > > > > > > effect, same as filling up data pool up to ~95 percent(btw, when I >> > > > > > > deleted this 50Gb file on cephfs, mds was stuck permanently and usage >> > > > > > > remained same until I dropped and recreated data pool - hope it`s one >> > > > > > > of known posix layer bugs). I also deleted entry from config, and then >> > > > > > > restarted mons, with no effect. Any suggestions? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm not sure what you're asking about here? >> > > > > > -Greg >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Oh, sorry, I have mislooked and thought that you suggested filling up >> > > > > osds. How do I can set full/nearfull ratios correctly? >> > > > > >> > > > > $ceph injectargs '--mon_osd_full_ratio 96' >> > > > > parsed options >> > > > > $ ceph injectargs '--mon_osd_near_full_ratio 94' >> > > > > parsed options >> > > > > >> > > > > ceph pg dump | grep 'full' >> > > > > full_ratio 0.95 >> > > > > nearfull_ratio 0.85 >> > > > > >> > > > > Setting parameters in the ceph.conf and then restarting mons does not >> > > > > affect ratios either. >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks, it worked, but setting values back result to turn warning back. >> > Hrm. That shouldn't be possible if the OSD has been removed. How did you take it out? It sounds like maybe you just marked it in the OUT state (and turned it off quite quickly) without actually taking it out of the cluster? >> > -Greg >> >> >> >> As I have did removal, it was definitely not like that - at first >> place, I have marked osds(4 and 5 on same host) out, then rebuilt >> crushmap and then kill osd processes. As I mentioned before, osd.4 >> doest not exist in crushmap and therefore it shouldn`t be reported at >> all(theoretically). > > Okay, that's what happened — marking an OSD out in the CRUSH map means all the data gets moved off it, but that doesn't remove it from all the places where it's registered in the monitor and in the map, for a couple reasons: > 1) You might want to mark an OSD out before taking it down, to allow for more orderly data movement. > 2) OSDs can get marked out automatically, but the system shouldn't be able to forget about them on its own. > 3) You might want to remove an OSD from the CRUSH map in the process of placing it somewhere else (perhaps you moved the physical machine to a new location). > etc. > > You want to run "ceph osd rm 4 5" and that should unregister both of them from everything[1]. :) > -Greg > [1]: Except for the full lists, which have a bug in the version of code you're running — remove the OSDs, then adjust the full ratios again, and all will be well. > $ ceph osd rm 4 osd.4 does not exist $ ceph -s health HEALTH_WARN 1 near full osd(s) monmap e3: 3 mons at {0=192.168.10.129:6789/0,1=192.168.10.128:6789/0,2=192.168.10.127:6789/0}, election epoch 58, quorum 0,1,2 0,1,2 osdmap e2198: 4 osds: 4 up, 4 in pgmap v586056: 464 pgs: 464 active+clean; 66645 MB data, 231 GB used, 95877 MB / 324 GB avail mdsmap e207: 1/1/1 up {0=a=up:active} $ ceph health detail HEALTH_WARN 1 near full osd(s) osd.4 is near full at 89% $ ceph osd dump .... max_osd 4 osd.0 up in weight 1 up_from 2183 up_thru 2187 down_at 2172 last_clean_interval [2136,2171) 192.168.10.128:6800/4030 192.168.10.128:6801/4030 192.168.10.128:6802/4030 exists,up 68b3deec-e80a-48b7-9c29-1b98f5de4f62 osd.1 up in weight 1 up_from 2136 up_thru 2186 down_at 2135 last_clean_interval [2115,2134) 192.168.10.129:6800/2980 192.168.10.129:6801/2980 192.168.10.129:6802/2980 exists,up b2a26fe9-aaa8-445f-be1f-fa7d2a283b57 osd.2 up in weight 1 up_from 2181 up_thru 2187 down_at 2172 last_clean_interval [2136,2171) 192.168.10.128:6803/4128 192.168.10.128:6804/4128 192.168.10.128:6805/4128 exists,up 378d367a-f7fb-4892-9ec9-db8ffdd2eb20 osd.3 up in weight 1 up_from 2136 up_thru 2186 down_at 2135 last_clean_interval [2115,2134) 192.168.10.129:6803/3069 192.168.10.129:6804/3069 192.168.10.129:6805/3069 exists,up faf8eda8-55fc-4a0e-899f-47dbd32b81b8 .... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
