Le 10/07/2012 17:56, Tommi Virtanen a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As I've keeped the original broken btrfs volumes, I tried this morning to
run the old osd in parrallel, using the $cluster variable. I only have
partial success.
The cluster mechanism was never intended for moving existing osds to
other clusters. Trying that might not be a good idea.
Ok, good to know. I saw that the remaining maps could lead to problem,
but in 2 words, what are the other associated risks ? Basically If I use
2 distincts config files,
with differents & non-overlapping paths, and different ports for OSD,
MDS & MON, we basically have 2 distincts and independant instances ?
By the way, is using 2 mon instance with different ports supported ?
Cheers,
--
Yann Dupont - Service IRTS, DSI Université de Nantes
Tel : 02.53.48.49.20 - Mail/Jabber : Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
