Hi, Do you think this is needed? The osdmap update need to hold this sem.As in function void ceph_osdc_handle_map(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, struct ceph_msg *msg) and function static int __map_request(), etc. Thanks a lot for your reply! thanks, Guanjun >>> On 6/15/2012 at 04:32 PM, in message <1339749120-7007-1-git-send-email-gjhe@xxxxxxxx>, Guanjun He <heguanbo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Guanjun He <heguanbo@xxxxxxxxx> > > I think the osdmap destroy code shoule be protected by map_sem. > If I was wrong, please correct me, thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Guanjun He <gjhe@xxxxxxxx> > --- > net/ceph/osd_client.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c > index 1ffebed..718b100 100644 > --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c > +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c > @@ -1872,11 +1872,13 @@ void ceph_osdc_stop(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc) > destroy_workqueue(osdc->notify_wq); > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&osdc->timeout_work); > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&osdc->osds_timeout_work); > + down_write(&osdc->map_sem); > if (osdc->osdmap) { > ceph_osdmap_destroy(osdc->osdmap); > osdc->osdmap = NULL; > } > remove_all_osds(osdc); > + up_write(&osdc->map_sem); > mempool_destroy(osdc->req_mempool); > ceph_msgpool_destroy(&osdc->msgpool_op); > ceph_msgpool_destroy(&osdc->msgpool_op_reply); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html