Re: iozone test crashed on ceph

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:15 PM, udit agarwal <fzdudit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>  Thank you all for your support in resolving the issue. As I mentioned in my
> previous post that I ran my iozone test again on a 5G file excluding the 4k
> record size. And now, I have successfully completed this test with record sizes
> of 8k and 16k and hopefully all others will also work fine. But I am still
> confused with the failure of the iozone test on 5G & 5M file with record size
> 4k, while it worked happily for files of sizes 10M & 10G.
>
>  Can anyone help me with this problem with suitable reasons??
>  Thanks in advance.

Smaller records means more operations which means all kinds of locking
bugs and races are more likely to manifest.

I created ticket http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2520 for us to add
iozone 4k random read/write into our test suite.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux