That wouldn't seem to make a lot of sense, no. Matt ----- "Sage Weil" <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Holger Macht wrote: > > Minor spec file fix. LGPLv2 in spec file is not correct, because > some of > > the included packages/binaries are GPLv2. For example: > > > > src/os/btrfs_ioctl.h -> package ceph, binary ceph-osd > > My understanding is that including a header file (in this case, to get > the > ioctl number) does not create a derivative work. Is that incorrect? > -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
