Re: Ceph on btrfs 3.4rc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 02:34:43PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
> 2012/5/22 Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>
> >
> > Yeah you would also need to change orphan_meta_reserved.  I fixed this by just
> > taking the BTRFS_I(inode)->lock when messing with these since we don't want to
> > take up all that space in the inode just for a marker.  I ran this patch for 3
> > hours with no issues, let me know if it works for you.  Thanks,
> 
> Compared to the last runs, I had to run it much longer, but somehow I
> managed to hit a BUG_ON again:
> 

Yeah it's because we access other parts of that bitfield with no lock at all
which is what is likely screwing us.  I'm going to have to redo that part and
then do the orphan fix, I'll have a patch shortly.  Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux