Re: Journal too small

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2012-05-12 13:31:04.034144 7f491061d700  1 journal check_for_full at
>> 863363072 : JOURNAL FULL 863363072 >= 1048571903 (max_size 1048576000
>> start 863363072)
>> 2012-05-12 13:31:04.034680 7f491061d700  0 journal JOURNAL TOO SMALL: item
>> 1693745152 > journal 1048571904 (usable)

> The osds tolerate the full journal.  There will be a big latency spike,
> but they'll recover without risking data.  You should definitely increase
> the journal size if this happens regulary, though.

I propose for your merging pleasure:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/journal-too-small
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/62db60bede8b187e25acb715f6616d2ce7cfc97f
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux