On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:33:34PM +0200, Martin Mailand wrote:
> Hi Josef,
>
> Am 11.05.2012 15:31, schrieb Josef Bacik:
> >That previous patch was against btrfs-next, this patch is against 3.4-rc6 if you
> >are on mainline. Thanks,
>
> I tried your patch against mainline, after a few minutes I hit this bug.
>
Heh duh, sorry, try this one instead. Thanks,
Josef
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
index 9b9b15f..54af1fa 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
@@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ struct btrfs_inode {
/* used to order data wrt metadata */
struct btrfs_ordered_inode_tree ordered_tree;
- /* for keeping track of orphaned inodes */
- struct list_head i_orphan;
-
/* list of all the delalloc inodes in the FS. There are times we need
* to write all the delalloc pages to disk, and this list is used
* to walk them all.
@@ -156,6 +153,7 @@ struct btrfs_inode {
unsigned dummy_inode:1;
unsigned in_defrag:1;
unsigned delalloc_meta_reserved:1;
+ unsigned has_orphan_item:1;
/*
* always compress this one file
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 8fd7233..aad2600 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ struct btrfs_root {
struct list_head root_list;
spinlock_t orphan_lock;
- struct list_head orphan_list;
+ atomic_t orphan_inodes;
struct btrfs_block_rsv *orphan_block_rsv;
int orphan_item_inserted;
int orphan_cleanup_state;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index a7ffc88..ff3bf4b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -1153,7 +1153,6 @@ static void __setup_root(u32 nodesize, u32 leafsize, u32 sectorsize,
root->orphan_block_rsv = NULL;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->dirty_list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->orphan_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->root_list);
spin_lock_init(&root->orphan_lock);
spin_lock_init(&root->inode_lock);
@@ -1166,6 +1165,7 @@ static void __setup_root(u32 nodesize, u32 leafsize, u32 sectorsize,
atomic_set(&root->log_commit[0], 0);
atomic_set(&root->log_commit[1], 0);
atomic_set(&root->log_writers, 0);
+ atomic_set(&root->orphan_inodes, 0);
root->log_batch = 0;
root->log_transid = 0;
root->last_log_commit = 0;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 61b16c6..5ba68d0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2072,12 +2072,12 @@ void btrfs_orphan_commit_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv;
int ret;
- if (!list_empty(&root->orphan_list) ||
+ if (atomic_read(&root->orphan_inodes) ||
root->orphan_cleanup_state != ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE)
return;
spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&root->orphan_list)) {
+ if (atomic_read(&root->orphan_inodes)) {
spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
return;
}
@@ -2134,8 +2134,8 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
block_rsv = NULL;
}
- if (list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
- list_add(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan, &root->orphan_list);
+ if (!BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item) {
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item = 1;
#if 0
/*
* For proper ENOSPC handling, we should do orphan
@@ -2148,6 +2148,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
insert = 1;
#endif
insert = 1;
+ atomic_inc(&root->orphan_inodes);
}
if (!BTRFS_I(inode)->orphan_meta_reserved) {
@@ -2195,9 +2196,13 @@ int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
int release_rsv = 0;
int ret = 0;
+ /*
+ * evict_inode gets called without holding the i_mutex so we need to
+ * take the orphan lock to make sure we are safe in messing with these.
+ */
spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
- list_del_init(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan);
+ if (BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item) {
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item = 0;
delete_item = 1;
}
@@ -2215,6 +2220,9 @@ int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
if (release_rsv)
btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
+ if (trans && delete_item)
+ atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -2352,9 +2360,8 @@ int btrfs_orphan_cleanup(struct btrfs_root *root)
* add this inode to the orphan list so btrfs_orphan_del does
* the proper thing when we hit it
*/
- spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- list_add(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan, &root->orphan_list);
- spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
+ atomic_inc(&root->orphan_inodes);
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item = 1;
/* if we have links, this was a truncate, lets do that */
if (inode->i_nlink) {
@@ -3671,7 +3678,7 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
if (root->fs_info->log_root_recovering) {
- BUG_ON(!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan));
+ BUG_ON(!BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item);
goto no_delete;
}
@@ -6914,6 +6921,7 @@ struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
ei->dummy_inode = 0;
ei->in_defrag = 0;
ei->delalloc_meta_reserved = 0;
+ ei->has_orphan_item = 0;
ei->force_compress = BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE;
ei->delayed_node = NULL;
@@ -6927,7 +6935,6 @@ struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
mutex_init(&ei->log_mutex);
mutex_init(&ei->delalloc_mutex);
btrfs_ordered_inode_tree_init(&ei->ordered_tree);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_orphan);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->delalloc_inodes);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->ordered_operations);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&ei->rb_node);
@@ -6972,13 +6979,11 @@ void btrfs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
}
- spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
+ if (BTRFS_I(inode)->has_orphan_item) {
printk(KERN_INFO "BTRFS: inode %llu still on the orphan list\n",
(unsigned long long)btrfs_ino(inode));
- list_del_init(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan);
+ atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
}
- spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
while (1) {
ordered = btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent(inode, (u64)-1);
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
