OSD Journal Failure Behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The Ceph Wiki (http://ceph.com/wiki/OSD_journal) does a pretty good
job explaining the purpose of the journal and various modes available.
 What isn't clear is what happens during the failure of a journal.

With the use of btrfs enabling parallel journaling, it sounds like
failure of a journal device would still enable OSD writes to occur
albeit at a slower pace.  In writeahead mode, failure of the journal
seems like it would take all OSDs using that device for journaling
offline.

Is this a correct assessment?  If the journal is a single point of
failure to a system with potentially multiple OSDs ... it might be
worth mentioning in one of the "building a cluster" or hardware pages
about journal redundancy.

Also, it would be nice to know what steps are required to replace a
journal.  (I think this is just an update of the cluster.conf with the
new journal device and a restart of the OSD process, correct?)

Best regards,
Calvin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux