On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:26:15AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:09:34PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote: > > > After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again. > > > Performance with the current "for-linux-min" branch and big metadata > > > is much better. The only problem (?) I'm still seeing is a warning > > > that seems to occur from time to time: > > Actually, before you do that... we have a new tool, > test_filestore_workloadgen, that generates a ceph-osd-like workload on the > local file system. It's a subset of what a full OSD might do, but if > we're lucky it will be sufficient to reproduce this issue. Something like > > test_filestore_workloadgen --osd-data /foo --osd-journal /bar > > will hopefully do the trick. > > Christian, maybe you can see if that is able to trigger this warning? > You'll need to pull it from the current master branch; it wasn't in the > last release. > Keep up the good work Sage, at this rate I'll never have to setup ceph for myself :), Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
