Re: [PATCH 0/3] Generic libcephfs Java wrappers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mar 7, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Noah Watkins wrote:

> As for producing an upstream patch, I think the two biggest concerns are:
> 
> 1. Reporting hostname/racks rather than IPs for object location.
> 2. Address (or at least document) the time synchronization issue.

Regarding (1), my last comment in this ticket (http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/1666) seems to indicate that a stat occurs on a client and the mtime in the cached inode is returned, but the client is expecting the mtime in the updated inode in the OSD.

Is there an easy way to invalidate the the inodes in a client to at least verify the problem?

Thanks,
- Noah

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux