On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner <f.wiessner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 22.01.2012 02:19, schrieb Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub: >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian >> Wiessner <f.wiessner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> 2) v1 -- ?+0 0x184dc00 >>> 2012-01-21 18:42:36.758683 7f60e26e0700 -- 192.168.0.6:6789/0 --> mon.3 >>> 192.168.0.7:6789/0 -- mon_probe(probe 6bac7900-17c9-47c4-8b8e-f3dd7c22c73d name >>> 2) v1 -- ?+0 0x184d900 >>> 2012-01-21 18:42:36.759270 7f60e6d62700 cephx: verify_authorizer_reply exception >>> in decode_decrypt with AQAM+RpP0JI9LRAAWyy1Flf5X6RUVxEjhAEFtg== >>> 2012-01-21 18:42:36.759287 7f60e6d62700 -- 192.168.0.6:6789/0 >> >>> 192.168.0.4:6789/0 pipe(0xc91500 sd=9 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).failed verifying authorize >>> reply >>> ^C >>> >>> >> Can you verify that there's no 'auth supported' line in your mon ceph.conf? >> >> Also, try running (with correct <ceph.conf>): >> >> # ceph-conf --lookup -c <ceph.conf> 'auth supported' --name mon.2 >> >> or just: >> >> # ceph-conf --lookup -c <ceph.conf> 'auth supported' > node04:/tmp# ceph-conf --lookup -c /etc/ceph/ceph.conf 'auth supported' --name mon.2 > none > node04:/tmp# ceph-conf --lookup -c /etc/ceph/ceph.conf 'auth supported' --name mon.0 > none > > > i now explicitly set auth supported = none, but still it is not working :( Have you previously used cephx? I notice that it was a commented-out line in your initial conf. :) I tried to reproduce quickly by creating a v0.39 system and upgrading to v0.40 and didn't see any trouble. Otherwise we'll need to start generating very explicit logs and stuff. -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
