Re: upgrade from 0.39 to 0.40 failed...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Am 21.01.2012 18:01, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
>>
>> Well, this config used to work with 0.39 - i did not see any hint in the relase
>> mail that i have to change something in the config - 0.40 should be mostly a
>> stabilization release...
>>
>> I can change the config etc and setup again when i am able to get my data out of
>> the current installation.
>>
>>>>
>>>> i did set up ceph without cephx
>>>
>>> When did you enable cephx? Did you do so from the upgrade to 0.39 to 0.40 or
>>> earlier?
>>
>> As stated above, i did not set up ceph with authentication. so there was no
>> authentication used in 0.39 nor in 0.40
>>
>> But now somehow authentication seems to be enforced - at least that's what i
>> read from the output that ceph -w gives me...
> 
> Actually that might just be a red herring — check the monitor log that
> your ceph -w client tried to connect to and see what it says about the
> connection attempt. :)


2012-01-21 18:31:04.073997 7f5fb6d08700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xcf3280 sd=10 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).connect got BADAUTHORIZER
2012-01-21 18:31:04.074472 7f5fb6d08700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xcf3280 sd=10 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).connect got BADAUTHORIZER
2012-01-21 18:31:04.074610 7f5fb6d08700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xcf3280 sd=10 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).connect got BADAUTHORIZER
2012-01-21 18:31:04.075132 7f5fb6d08700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xcf3280 sd=10 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).connect got BADAUTHORIZER
2012-01-21 18:31:04.075299 7f5fb6d08700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xcf3280 sd=10 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).connect got BADAUTHORIZER
2012-01-21 18:31:04.075960 7f5fb6d08700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xcf3280 sd=10 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).connect got BADAUTHORIZER
2012-01-21 18:31:04.076097 7f5fb6d08700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xcf3280 sd=10 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).connect got BADAUTHORIZER
2012-01-21 18:31:04.076494 7f5fb6d08700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xcf3280 sd=10 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).connect got BADAUTHORIZER
2012-01-21 18:31:04.076643 7f5fb6d08700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xcf3280 sd=10 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).connect got BADAUTHORIZER
2012-01-21 18:31:04.547643 7f5fb7509700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 --> mon.1
192.168.0.5:6789/0 -- mon_probe(probe 6bac7900-17c9-47c4-8b8e-f3dd7c22c73d name
0) v1 -- ?+0 0xd27000
2012-01-21 18:31:04.547670 7f5fb7509700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 --> mon.2
192.168.0.6:6789/0 -- mon_probe(probe 6bac7900-17c9-47c4-8b8e-f3dd7c22c73d name
0) v1 -- ?+0 0xd26c00
2012-01-21 18:31:04.547682 7f5fb7509700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 --> mon.3
192.168.0.7:6789/0 -- mon_probe(probe 6bac7900-17c9-47c4-8b8e-f3dd7c22c73d name
0) v1 -- ?+0 0xd26900
2012-01-21 18:31:04.737547 7f5fb6601700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >> :/0
pipe(0xd03a00 sd=13 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).accept sd=13
2012-01-21 18:31:04.737772 7f5fb6601700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xd03a00 sd=13 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).accept connect_seq 0 vs
existing 0 state 1
2012-01-21 18:31:06.547711 7f5fb7509700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 --> mon.1
192.168.0.5:6789/0 -- mon_probe(probe 6bac7900-17c9-47c4-8b8e-f3dd7c22c73d name
0) v1 -- ?+0 0xd26600
2012-01-21 18:31:06.547743 7f5fb7509700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 --> mon.2
192.168.0.6:6789/0 -- mon_probe(probe 6bac7900-17c9-47c4-8b8e-f3dd7c22c73d name
0) v1 -- ?+0 0xd26300
2012-01-21 18:31:06.547755 7f5fb7509700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 --> mon.3
192.168.0.7:6789/0 -- mon_probe(probe 6bac7900-17c9-47c4-8b8e-f3dd7c22c73d name
0) v1 -- ?+0 0xd26000
2012-01-21 18:31:06.737632 7f5fb62fe700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >> :/0
pipe(0xd03c80 sd=12 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).accept sd=12
2012-01-21 18:31:06.737863 7f5fb62fe700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xd03c80 sd=12 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).accept connect_seq 0 vs
existing 0 state 1
2012-01-21 18:31:08.547765 7f5fb7509700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 --> mon.1
192.168.0.5:6789/0 -- mon_probe(probe 6bac7900-17c9-47c4-8b8e-f3dd7c22c73d name
0) v1 -- ?+0 0xd28c00
2012-01-21 18:31:08.547787 7f5fb7509700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 --> mon.2
192.168.0.6:6789/0 -- mon_probe(probe 6bac7900-17c9-47c4-8b8e-f3dd7c22c73d name
0) v1 -- ?+0 0xd28900
2012-01-21 18:31:08.547799 7f5fb7509700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 --> mon.3
192.168.0.7:6789/0 -- mon_probe(probe 6bac7900-17c9-47c4-8b8e-f3dd7c22c73d name
0) v1 -- ?+0 0xd28600
2012-01-21 18:31:08.737640 7f5fb62fe700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >> :/0
pipe(0xd03a00 sd=12 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).accept sd=12
2012-01-21 18:31:08.737872 7f5fb62fe700 -- 192.168.0.4:6789/0 >>
192.168.0.6:6789/0 pipe(0xd03a00 sd=12 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).accept connect_seq 0 vs
existing 0 state 1


But still no clue what to do...

-- 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Florian Wiessner

Smart Weblications GmbH
Martinsberger Str. 1
D-95119 Naila

fon.: +49 9282 9638 200
fax.: +49 9282 9638 205
24/7: +49 900 144 000 00 - 0,99 EUR/Min*
http://www.smart-weblications.de

--
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Naila
Geschäftsführer: Florian Wiessner
HRB-Nr.: HRB 3840 Amtsgericht Hof
*aus dem dt. Festnetz, ggf. abweichende Preise aus dem Mobilfunknetz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux