On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Guido Winkelmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ceph -s reports most of my PGs as "active+clean", but a small number will stay
> > at just "active":
> >
> > # ceph -s
> > 2012-01-06 11:16:44.832625 pg v278953: 396 pgs: 8 active, 388 active+clean;
> > 70764 MB data, 157 GB used, 4994 GB / 5257 GB avail; 170/38388 degraded
> > (0.443%)
Whoops, Yehuda just pointed out that there are degraded objects here too.
So that's a less-harmless bug. :)
Which version?
Also, can you post the output from
ceph pg dump | grep degraded
Thanks!
sage
> > 2012-01-06 11:16:44.842568 mds e9: 1/1/1 up {0=alpha=up:active}
> > 2012-01-06 11:16:44.842648 osd e243: 6 osds: 6 up, 6 in
> > 2012-01-06 11:16:44.842799 log 2012-01-06 06:12:00.829148 osd.4
> > 10.3.1.35:6800/1490 343 : [INF] 0.4e scrub ok
> > 2012-01-06 11:16:44.844179 mon e5: 3 mons at
> > {ceph1=10.3.1.33:6789/0,ceph2=10.3.1.34:6789/0,ceph3=10.3.1.35:6789/0}
> >
> > It's been like that for several days now. IIRC, the last thing I did with the
> > cluster was to add some more OSDs. The last time this happened, the problem
> > went away after restarting some of the OSDs.
> >
> > What does this mean? Is that a bug?
>
> That does sound like a bug, altho a reasonably harmless one. Which
> version are you running?
>
> sage
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
