RBD layering needs to work across pools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi list, hi Josh.

This came up in an OpenStack conversation today:

if we store "template images" and "volumes" both in RBD, it would make
a lot of sense prevent the Nova nodes from accidentally writing to the
golden images. That is, have the templates in a separate pool that is
writeable to Glance, but read-only for the Nova nodes.

To support this, we'd need to make sure the RBD layering we're
building is able to use base images in a separate pool. (And handle
the ugly case where after a misconfiguration the client can't access
the base image anymore...)

Josh, can you say whether that falls in line with what's been planned
for the layering?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux