Re: [patch RFC] client: return stripe address replicas

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:56, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Noah Watkins wrote:
>
> The only issue with this is that, in the event that you don't guess a
> sufficiently large array on the first call, you may need to call again,
> and in some cases that may mean multiple MDS requests.  Normally that's
> not the case.  And a smart caller should guess 4 and only pass 0 and then
> N if 4 failed.  But a naive caller will always make two calls, first with
> 0 and then with N, and in some cases that's actually slower.

The code I'm using makes a large guess, and an alternative is for the
user to cache the replication factor for a file? A similar approach using
ERANGE is used by listxattr (well, it communicates ERANGE via errno).
In any case, even with Tommi's *naddr_out approach, a certain amount
of precise documentation on it's semantics is needed.

- Noah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux