Re: ceph on btrfs [was Re: ceph on non-btrfs file systems]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:15:45PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:05:12AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
> > > 
> > > Attached is a perf-report. I have included the whole report, so that
> > > you can see the difference between the good and the bad
> > > btrfs-endio-wri.
> > >
> > 
> > We also shouldn't be running run_ordered_operations, man this is screwed up,
> > thanks so much for this, I should be able to nail this down pretty easily.
> > Thanks,
> 
> Looks like we're getting there from reserve_metadata_bytes when we join
> the transaction?
>

We don't do reservations in the endio stuff, we assume you've reserved all the
space you need in delalloc, plus we would have seen reserve_metadata_bytes in
the trace.  Though it does look like perf is lying to us in at least one case
sicne btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent is only called from log replay and not
during normal runtime, so it definitely shouldn't be showing up.  Thanks,

Josef 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux