Re: OSD blocked for more than 120 seconds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

It seems that ext4 and btrfs are not to be considered as stable for
now. Does anyone could confirm that
ext3 is the best choice for this moment ?

On 17 October 2011 13:49, Martin Mailand <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 17.10.2011 11:40, schrieb Christian Brunner:
>>
>> 2011/10/15 Martin Mailand<martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> Hi Christian,
>>> I have a very similar experience, I also used josef's tree and btrfs
>>> snaps =
>>> 0, the next problem I had than was excessive fragmentation, so I  used
>>> this
>>> patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131495014823121&w=2, and changed
>>> the
>>> btrfs option to (btrfs options = noatime,nodatacow,autodefrag) that kept
>>> the
>>> fragmentation under control.
>>> But even with this setup after a few days the load on the osd is
>>> unbearable.
>>
>> How did you find out about our fragmentation issues? Was it just a
>> performance problem?
>>
>
> I used filefrag to show the number of extents, after the patch, I have on
> average 1,14 extents per 4MB ceph object on the osd.
>
>>> As far as I understood the doku if you disable the btrfs snapshot
>>> functionality the writeahead journal is activated.
>>> http://ceph.newdream.net/wiki/Ceph.conf
>>> And I get this in the logs.
>>> mount: enabling WRITEAHEAD journal mode: 'filestore btrfs snap' mode is
>>> not
>>> enabled
>>>
>>> May I asked what kind of probs you did have with ext4? Because I am
>>> looking
>>> into this direction as well.
>>
>> You can read about our ext4 problems here:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&m=131201869703245&w=2
>
> I still can reproduce the bug with v3.1-rc9.
>
>>
>> Our bugreport with RedHat didn't make any progress for a long time,
>> but last week RedHat made two sugestions:
>>
>> - If you configure ceph with 'filestore flusher = false', do you see
>> any different behavior?
>> - If you mount with -o noauto_da_alloc does it change anything?
>>
>> Since I have just migrated to btrfs, I've some problems to check this,
>> but I'll try to do this as soon as I can get hold of some extra
>> hardware.
>>
> I can check this, I have a spare cluster at the moment.
>
>> Regards,
>> Christian
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Tomasz Paszkowski
SS7, Asterisk, SAN, Datacenter, Cloud Computing
+48500166299
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux