2011/9/22 Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > The obvious answer is that yes, we should support it. The only reason I > can see not doing so it because there is some uglyness in what SNIA ended > up with, or it is sufficiently divigergent from the S3 and Swift APIs that > it doesn't make sense to put it in the same proxy. Yeah, and it also has a different data model. For example: - each object is required to have a unique fixed-length key, in addition to the object name - containers are multi-level, not just flat buckets - etc There seem to be some open source CDMI servers out there: Proxy CDMI to e.g. S3: https://github.com/livenson/vcdm (it seems like one could run that in front of radosgw) Serves a local filesystem as CDMI: https://github.com/koenbollen/cdmi-serve Compliance tests?: https://github.com/livenson/ocmi-tester Erlang proof-of-concept: https://github.com/jeastman/crime -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
