On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > I don't think there's anything controversial here. I suspect the main > > concern is that these fields are named in a sufficiently general fashion > > so that they can be used for other backend storage types. > > I guess the best is to start with the patches with the XML changes as > an RFC and then add the code to wire the backend as a second step. Even > if both are likely to be applied as a batch, the XML code review is > likely to be the most controversial :-) The first two patches of the series I posted last week add the authentication bits to src/conf/. I just updated to include changes to the schema files (docs/schemas) and am reposting. Thanks! sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
