[Resend due to vger failing earlier] I guess it's safe to say that nobody's concerned about this. :) I'm with you that RADOS bindings shouldn't live under Filesys, so unless anybody thinks that libceph is going to get Perl bindings as well, and that that would need to go under Filesys (I don't know what the namespace rules are), you should go for it! :) -Greg On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As mentioned earlier, I'm working on gluing perl onto the back of > librados (or at least giving it a good duct-taping). As part of > registering the namespace for the module in CPAN, I just need to get > some feedback and show that others involved with Ceph development are > aware and are ok with the namespace being used. I was going to try to > register "Ceph::RADOS", not quite sure if it would fit under > "Filesys::Ceph::RADOS" as it's not really anything to do with > manipulating the filesystem per se, and did not see any other root > namespaces that would be an obvious fit. Let me know what you think. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
