On Tue, 31 May 2011, Tommi Virtanen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:44:30AM +0300, Fyodor Ustinov wrote: > > As I understand with -m key cfuse should not require ceph.conf. > > It does need a config, to even know whether it should attempt > cryptographic authentication or not (and where to find the key, etc). > > It could be changed to do things more like the kernel client, > but as is, it always requires a config file. > > > root@st8:~# cfuse -c /dev/null -m 10.5.51.230:6789 /stor01 > ... > > root@st8:~# ls -al /stor01/ > > total 1 > > drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 2011-06-01 00:22 . > > drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 2011-05-31 01:27 bbb > > root@st8:~# > > > > P.S. BTW, where ".." directory? > > Oh, heh, that's interesting. > > It seems "." and ".." are optional, according to POSIX: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=E1O3s82-0008BY-MW%40pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu&forum_name=fuse-devel I couldn't figure out how to make a (correct) .. when writing the original fuse glue layer way back when. Hmm, it looks like sshfs generates one, so it's at lesat possible. It's probably simple enough to fix. sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
