On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Gregory Farnum <gregf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Brian Chrisman <brchrisman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> They differentiate between xattrs on symlinks or on the files at which >> they point. >> If I recall, it's a slight difference internally to the Client class >> whether a value is passed to path_walk as true/false, though I may be >> misinterpreting that. I can look at that again. >> >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Gregory Farnum <gregf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> What are the 'l'-prefixed functions for? They look like they're just >>> duplicates except for the prefix. >>> -Greg > > Ah, right. I didn't notice the different flag values in the call to > path_walk. :) I think you're right about what it means, though! > Maybe we could give them more descriptive names or something? lsetxattr and friends are known linux API functions, and have corresponding system calls with the same name. I say let's keep them as is. Yehuda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
