Re: Ideas on NSS vs fork?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Colin Patrick McCabe wrote:
> > The "remove this" comment on libceph_initialized cannot be blindly
> > acted on; similar logic could be pushed down into ceph::crypto::init,
> > though.
> >
> > This is ugly, but it's the best I could do. Please go through the code
> > and let me know if you have any ideas on how to make it less painful.
> 
> Daemonization should be done in common_init. Obviously, only daemons 
> will do it!

Well, probably after that.  There is a lot of initialization that 
intentionally runs before daemonization (so that you get feedback on 
errors, etc.).

> Daemonization has nothing to do with the messenger logically, so it
> will be good to get that stuff out of there.

Yeah.  SimpleMessenger::start() basically does some checks, forks, and 
then starts a thread.  The forking bit can be moved out, and I think most 
of the checks are obsolete anyway.

sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux