Hi Yehuda
Thanks for the advice.
Actually the existing code did the job (filter the query string out).
In rgw_rest.cc:
636 s->path_name_url = FCGX_GetParam("REQUEST_URI", s->fcgx->envp);
637 int pos = s->path_name_url.find('?');
638 if (pos >= 0)
639 s->path_name_url = s->path_name_url.substr(0, pos);
And my workaround uses the filtered REQUEST_URI (s->path_name_url). It
should be much closer to SCRIPT_NAME.
Anyway, I will back to check Lighttpd. :D
Best Regards,
CC
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
<yehudasa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:20 AM, cclien <cclien@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I just tried to deploy a rados gateway with Lighttpd.
>> But it have some trouble parsing object names.
>>
>> Here's what I found in debug log on the non-working copy:
>> RADOS S3 Gateway: SCRIPT_NAME=/mybucket
>> RADOS S3 Gateway: REQUEST_URI=/mybucket/ceph.tgz
>
> That doesn't look right. May be some lighttpd configuration tweaking issue?
>
>>
>> I think it will be better to retrive user's request from REQUEST_URI.
>>
>
> The problem with REQUEST_URI is that it'll consist the entire line,
> including any parameters added. So using it requires some extra work
> to check for that (pretty trivial, but you should also take care of
> that).
>
> Thanks,
> Yehuda
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
