Hey Laszlo, On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 22:02 -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote: > [ about OpenSSL license exception for ceph ] > > I removed all the openssl references in the ceph code and replaced it > > with crypto++, so hopefully all this discussion is now moot. It's all > > pushed to the ceph rc branch. > Does it mean that I shouldn't upload v0.23.2 [1] to Debian? Wait for > the v0.24.0 release and upload that one? I know v0.23.2 is not even > noted as a release on the homepage, but tagged in the git tree. > Main changes are that debian/source/format is re-added, the tree cleaned > as make distclean, backported cephfs.8 manpage as a patch, pristine > clean the source, noted myself as maintainer while Sage remains as an > uploader. Yeah, let's just wait for 0.24. BTW, I made radosacl only build --with-debug; it can be dropped from the package. Thanks- sage > > Laszlo/GCS > Ps: Please delete parts of the email that not relevant to the > conversation. > [1] dget http://www.routers.hu/gcs/ceph_0.23.2-1.dsc > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html