On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 04:09:31PM -0700, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote: >> >> Does this seem sane? Any comments would be greatly appreciated. > > It sounds like you need to use configfs instead of sysfs, as your model > was the reason it was created. > > Have you tried that? Oh, will look at it now. With ceph (although for a different purpose) we went through proc -> sysfs -> debugfs, however, it seems that we've missed at least one userspace-kernel channel. Thanks, Yehuda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html