Re: client-standalone/master-backport: "CEPH_VERSION" redefined

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
> > what is the worklfow in client-standalone - not unstable to master? which 
> > one should be used for testing?
> 
> I have a script that mirrors just the commits affecting fs/ceph in the 
> kernel git tree (http://pastebin.org/433717), so the -standalone.git 
> unstable matches the ceph-client.git unstable branch.  Generally I don't 
> bother cleaning up and rebasing the unstable tree there until it's time to 
> send things upstream for the merge window or there is some other specific 
> reason to.  I'll do that as soon as 2.6.35 is out.  In the meantime, you 
> should be able to merge the -standalone.git unstable into master-backport 
> with minimal pain.

I just did a rebase and some cleanup for the merge window.  It'll get 
rebased once more after 2.6.35.

And the CEPH_VERSION warning can be ignored... it'll go away soon!

sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux