On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 12:34:35 pm Brian Jackson wrote: > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 03:54:00 am Thomas Mueller wrote: > > hi > > > > reading the version in ceph_fs.h made me think, that now that ceph is in > > vanilla kernel, it would be nice to have the version linked to the kernel > > version. this is how the kvm guys work for their backported module. > > That makes sense for KVM because it's reached a level of maturity where > they only bother doing the backports of specific kernel releases. I don't > think it's a good idea for ceph to go this direction yet. Mostly I'd hate > to see the standalone client packages only released when there's a new > kernel. It seems like something that would be more useful once ceph has > some kernel releases under it's belt. Cancel that. Talked to sagewk on irc and he said development of the kclient is taking place in upstream git now, so I guess this does make sense. > > > I've also patched super.c to expose the version to modinfo. > > > > - Thomas > > <snip> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
