Re: crushmap rule issue: choose vs. chooseleaf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 14:18 -0600, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Jim Schutt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 12:20 -0600, Sage Weil wrote:
> > > Hi Jim,
> > > 
> > > Okay, I fixed another bug and am now able to use your map without 
> > > problems.  The fix is pushed to the unstable branch in ceph.git.
> > 
> > Great, thanks!  I really appreciate you being able to take a look so 
> > quickly.
> 
> No problem!
> 
> > > I'm surprised we didn't run into this before.. it looks like it's been 
> > > broken for a while.  I'm adding a tracker item to set up some unit tests 
> > > for this stuff so we can avoid this sort of regression.. the crush code 
> > > should be really easy to check.
> > 
> > That sounds great.
> > 
> > I'm still having a little trouble, though.
> > 
> > My map works for me now, in the sense that I can mount
> > the file system from a client.
> > 
> > But when I try to write to it, vmstat on the server shows
> > I get a little burst of I/O on the servers, and then nothing.
> 
> Oh, the same fix needs to be applied to the kernel code as well.  I've 
> just pushed that out (ceph-client.git master and 
> ceph-client-standalone.git master+master-backport branches).  Hopefully 
> that will clear it up?

Yes, indeed.

Thanks again!

-- Jim

> 
> sage
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux