On 9 August 2010 19:31, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sounds like a seriously broken installer, though. The versions will > constantly change through regular maintenance updates. I concur. I have a suspicion that the problem is not the installer but the DBAs doing the installation. For some reason most of the DBAs I know tend to be somewhat anal retentive. -- Hakan (m1fcj) - http://www.hititgunesi.org _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Downgrade libgcc & gcc packages (is there a clean way)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Downgrade libgcc & gcc packages (is there a clean way)
- From: Hakan Koseoglu <hakan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 19:33:59 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <201008091131.24054@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- Downgrade libgcc & gcc packages (is there a clean way)
- From: Dan Burkland
- Re: Downgrade libgcc & gcc packages (is there a clean way)
- From: Hakan Koseoglu
- Re: Downgrade libgcc & gcc packages (is there a clean way)
- From: Dan Burkland
- Re: Downgrade libgcc & gcc packages (is there a clean way)
- From: Alan Hodgson
- Downgrade libgcc & gcc packages (is there a clean way)
- Prev by Date: Re: Downgrade libgcc & gcc packages (is there a clean way)
- Next by Date: XEN virtualization of a Windows installation
- Previous by thread: Re: Downgrade libgcc & gcc packages (is there a clean way)
- Next by thread: Re: Downgrade libgcc & gcc packages (is there a clean way)
- Index(es):
 |