On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 13:58 +0000, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > ? That's what fail2ban is setup to do, as the email suggested its > not restoring bans correctly on restarts. --- http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Fail2ban:Community_Portal "Question about persistant IP bans over restart" I think you need to adapt the example to CentOS/RH John _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: fail2ban behavior
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: fail2ban behavior
- From: JohnS <jses27@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:01:16 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CA5A491E9DEFBE4CB777DE97E21575E906BB9AC5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fail2ban behavior
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: fail2ban behavior
- References:
- fail2ban behavior
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: fail2ban behavior
- From: JohnS
- Re: fail2ban behavior
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- fail2ban behavior
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file
- Next by Date: Re: fail2ban behavior
- Previous by thread: Re: fail2ban behavior
- Next by thread: Re: fail2ban behavior
- Index(es):
 |