John R Pierce wrote: > On 08/03/10 11:31 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: >> But then is ZFS a Cluster filesystem at all like GFS2/OCFS? Haven't >> studied that angle as yet. > > its not. and, afaik, the linux implementation of ZFS is not very well > supported, I certainly wouldn't commit to a project relying on it > without a LOT of testing. ZFS is very stable on Solaris, and I > understand its working quite well with FreeBSD > > Supposedly the new btfs for linux will be the choice. i'll remain > skeptical of that until its proven itself in varied production > environments by others. I thought there was a small limit on the number of hard links in btfs - that might make it unsuitable for general purpose use. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos