On 7/28/2010 12:19 AM, Nataraj wrote: > > Are there any advantages to running FreeNX over vncserver? Does it > perform better? I have run both. On a local network, they are about the same. Over the Internet, FreeNX is much more responsive. -- Bowie _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- From: Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:11:51 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4C4FAFB7.7050802@xxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1
- References:
- Enabling X on headless server via network
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- From: Hakan Koseoglu
- Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- From: Hakan Koseoglu
- Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- From: Nataraj
- Enabling X on headless server via network
- Prev by Date: efi-app-x86_64 on 5.5?
- Next by Date: Re: how to install centos on the attached external usb hard disk?
- Previous by thread: Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- Next by thread: Re: Enabling X on headless server via network
- Index(es):
 |