Re: To PAE or not to PAE...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 07/22/2010 02:39 PM Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> JD,
> On 22/07/10 10:25, John Doe wrote:
>> I was wondering if anyone would know the cons of running a PAE kernel...?
>> I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
>> those exta 700MB...
> You should use 64 bit if possible but if you're seeing 3.2GB, it's more 
> likely that your motherboard is not capable (I have one of those here 
> right now).
> 
>> In the past, I heard that these 700MB were normally reserved for bios or chipset
>> stuff...
> It still is, even with with 64 bit. If your motherboard supports 
> remapping this memory with 64 bit you can use the whole 4GB. Otherwise 
> you're limited to 3.2:
> 
> hakan@photon:~$ free -m
>               total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
> Mem:          3262       1972       1290          0        103        737
> -/+ buffers/cache:       1131       2131
> Swap:         7812        308       7504
> hakan@photon:~$ arch
> x86_64

I'm trying to catch up...

Is the 737M cached (in the output above) what is reserved for bios or
chipset...?  and what is gained back through remapping?

tnx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux