On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 07/20/2010 10:26 AM, R P Herrold wrote: >> >> Reading that and the companion mentioned in the last comment, >> my takeaway is that fonts in fedora are (or were) bad [I trust >> m miller's judgment here, and have for a long time, as he is >> a thoughtful analyst] > > Which fonts? read the bugs -- I just summarised, and for the reasons stated in the prior post -- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
freetype bytecode interpreter
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: R P Herrold <herrold@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:06:19 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4C45FD0C.1040104@xxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Alpine 1.00 (LRH 882 2007-12-20)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: Gordon Messmer
- Re: freetype bytecode interpreter
- References:
- freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: Frank Cox
- freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: R P Herrold
- Re: freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: Frank Cox
- freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: R P Herrold
- Re: freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: Gordon Messmer
- freetype bytecode interpreter
- Prev by Date: Re: boot process glitch due to missing 2nd disk
- Next by Date: Re: boot process glitch due to missing 2nd disk
- Previous by thread: Re: freetype bytecode interpreter
- Next by thread: Re: freetype bytecode interpreter
- Index(es):
 |