On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 13:26 -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > File the bug on that product [rhel 6/beta] as well, and > explain why it would be the right thing to do, and what the > needed fix are, (preferably with patches), and why taht is a > low risk, high gain decision, and it will flow into CentOS > faster ;) As you noted, it sounds like a loser at the present time due to the apparent bad fonts issue. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: freetype bytecode interpreter
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:15:33 -0600
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <alpine.LRH.1.00.1007201318030.20413@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: Melville Theatre
- References:
- freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: Frank Cox
- freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: R P Herrold
- Re: freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: Frank Cox
- freetype bytecode interpreter
- From: R P Herrold
- freetype bytecode interpreter
- Prev by Date: Re: Odd fsck problem
- Next by Date: Re: Odd fsck problem
- Previous by thread: freetype bytecode interpreter
- Next by thread: Re: freetype bytecode interpreter
- Index(es):
 |