On 07/08/10 2:39 PM, Seth Bardash wrote: > To the Linux Community at Large: > > I reported to this list back in January, 2010 that the standard x86_64 > kernel, when built from the src.rpm and modified for ... I don't understand how you think that this is a bug. you modified something and it broke. the provided redhat binary kernels work fine as advertised. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: OT: ?? Centos Still Broken, Red Hat won't fix ??
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: OT: ?? Centos Still Broken, Red Hat won't fix ??
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:25:21 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4C36459D.8010807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: ?? Centos Still Broken, Red Hat won't fix ??
- From: Seth Bardash
- Re: OT: ?? Centos Still Broken, Red Hat won't fix ??
- References:
- OT: ?? Centos Still Broken, Red Hat won't fix ??
- From: Seth Bardash
- OT: ?? Centos Still Broken, Red Hat won't fix ??
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: ?? Centos Still Broken, Red Hat won't fix ??
- Next by Date: OT: ?? Centos Still Broken, Red Hat won't fix ??
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: ?? Centos Still Broken, Red Hat won't fix ??
- Next by thread: Re: OT: ?? Centos Still Broken, Red Hat won't fix ??
- Index(es):
 |