Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 01/07/2010 16:08, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> Then these start pulling in their own dependencies and I wind up with a
>> list of 43 new packages being installed for dependencies. I just find
>> this really strange since none of these were required for the previous
>> version.
>>
>
> That is quite interesting. I guess the question next is : was the
> machine in a state where all deps resolved cleanly before you attempted
> the install ?
>
As far as I know, these machines had everything installed cleanly via
yum. And all of my 5.x systems show the same behavior.
> Although, the new xul ad firefox update were a major step forward.
>
That may explain it. That's basically why I was asking here. I saw two
options -- either the package had been legitimately updated with the new
deps, or it was a packaging error that added in some extraneous deps.
--
Bowie
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
