On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:11:00PM +0800, sync wrote: > dn: cn=admins,dc=X,dc=org > changetype: add > objectClass: groupOfNames > objectClass: top > objectClass: posixGroup > cn: admins > gidNumber: 1001 > member: cn=admin,dc=X,dc=org Shouldn't these members be membeUid and just be the local unix username? "fred", "john", "harry" etc. I thought posixGroup went like this: dn: cn=admins,dc=X,dc=org cn: admins gidnumber: 1001 objectClass: top objectClass: posixGroup memberUid: john memberUid: fred memberUid: harry -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: posixGroup LDIF problem
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: posixGroup LDIF problem
- From: Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:46:46 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTilPUIAbKZ-Bm-5B6HD1_7HxVjvsoqmg94UlP5Vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
- References:
- posixGroup LDIF problem
- From: sync
- posixGroup LDIF problem
- Prev by Date: Re: CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI
- Next by Date: Re: centos 5.5 on optiplex 745
- Previous by thread: posixGroup LDIF problem
- Next by thread: Problem in migrating DRBD from CentOS4.4 to CentOS5.5
- Index(es):
 |